Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of waste energy recovery of a diesel engine using a dual organic Rankine cycle

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assist. Prof., Energy and Environment Research Group, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Boroujerd, Iran

2 BSc of Mech. Eng., Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Boroujerd, Iran

Abstract
In the present research, the thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of using the waste heat of a diesel engine to produce power has been investigated. In the dual cycle used, the high temperature cycle uses the energy of the exhaust gases and the low temperature cycle uses R245fa and R134a as the working fluid, respectively, in order to recover the waste heat of the intake air and engine cooling fluid. Energy analysis shows that the net power values of low temperature cycle, high temperature cycle and net power of the cycle are equal to 11.45 kW, 6.98 kW and 16.65 kW, respectively. Also, the energy and exergy efficiency of the cycle are obtained as 17.36% and 28.29%, respectively. The results of the economic analysis show that the evaporator and turbine of the high-temperature cycle have the highest overall cost compared to other cycle components and it is necessary to pay more attention than other system components. In addition, the overall exergy-economic factor of the cycle is equal to 32.52%. Therefore, 67.48% of the total costs of the cycle are due to exergy destruction, and the high temperature cycle evaporator has a significant contribution to these costs.

Keywords

Subjects


9- مراجع
[1] A. Azarpour, S. Suhaimi, G. Zahedi, and A. Bahadori, A Review on the Drawbacks of Renewable Energy as a Promising Energy Source of the Future, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 317–328, 2013.
[2] S. A. Abbasi and N. Abbasi, The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources, Applied Energy, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 121–144, 2000.
[3] M. McCartney, Living with dams: managing the environmental impacts, Water Policy, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 121–139, 2009.
[4] R. Rahayu, S. A. Mathias, S. Reaney, G. Vesuviano, R. Suwarman, and A. M. Ramdhan, Impact of land cover, rainfall and topography on flood risk in West Java, Natural Hazards, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 1735–1758, 2023.
[5] A. Cho, Energy’s Tricky Tradeoffs, Science, Vol. 329, No. 5993, pp. 786–787, 2010.
[6] W. D. Dean, Wind Turbine Mechanical Vibrations: Potential Environmental Threat, Energy & Environment, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 303–307, 2008.
[7] D. Honnery and P. Moriarty, Liquid fuels from woody biomass, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 103–114, 2007.
[8] T. Tsoutsos, N. Frantzeskaki, and V. Gekas, Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies, Energy Policy, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 289–296, 2005.
[9] E. L. Majer et al., Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems, Geothermics, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 185–222, 2007.
[10] M. He, X. Zhang, K. Zeng, and K. Gao, A combined thermodynamic cycle used for waste heat recovery of internal combustion engine, Energy, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 6821–6829, 2011.
[11] C. Yue, D. Han, W. Pu, and W. He, Comparative analysis of a bottoming transcritical ORC and a Kalina cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 89, pp. 764–774, 2015.
[12] A. T. Hoang, Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle, Applied Energy, Vol. 231, pp. 138–166, 2018.
[13] L. Lyu, W. Chen, A. Kan, Y. Zhang, S. Xue, and J. Zeng, Investigation of a Dual-Loop ORC for the Waste Heat Recovery of a Marine Main Engine, Energies, Vol. 15, No. 22., 2022.
[14] X. Liu, M. Q. Nguyen, J. Chu, T. Lan, and M. He, A novel waste heat recovery system combing steam Rankine cycle and organic Rankine cycle for marine engine, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 265, p. 121502, 2020.
[15] P. Reddy, Energy and exergy analyses of a two-stage organic rankine cycle with low pressure stage regeneration for IC engine waste heat recovery, Journal of Thermal Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 573–586, 2022.
[16] P. Varshil and D. Deshmukh, A comprehensive review of waste heat recovery from a diesel engine using organic rankine cycle, Energy Reports, Vol. 7, pp. 3951–3970, 2021.
[17] H. Kianfard, S. Khalilarya, and S. Jafarmadar, Exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation of hydrogen and distilled water production via combination of PEM electrolyzer, RO desalination unit and geothermal driven dual fluid ORC, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 177, pp. 339–349, 2018.
[18] S. Yosaf and H. Ozcan, Exergoeconomic investigation of flue gas driven ejector absorption power system integrated with PEM electrolyser for hydrogen generation, Energy, Vol. 163, pp. 88–99, 2018.
[19] N. Chitgar and M. Moghimi, Design and evaluation of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC-GT for electricity, fresh water and hydrogen production, Energy, Vol. 197, p. 117162, 2020.
[20] M. Sadeghi, S. M. S. Mahmoudi, and R. Khoshbakhti Saray, Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of an ejector refrigeration cycle powered by an internal combustion (HCCI) engine, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 96, pp. 403–417, 2015.
[21] G. Manente, A. Lazzaretto, and E. Bonamico, Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems, Energy, Vol. 123, pp. 413–431, 2017.

  • Receive Date 15 September 2023
  • Revise Date 17 November 2023
  • Accept Date 15 May 2024